|
The final product is your final
data not how well you managed the project! |
||||||||||||
Please contact me for a quote. Our like for like data management costs are typically 1,000
pounds lower than AEA and King's College. Our real-time and historic website http://www.ukairquality.net is also
included since this is our best tool for continually monitoring performance
of your site 24/7. There
may be cheaper "data ratifiers" but poor quality and obvious
mistakes are included in the package. You need to compare this small cost with the significant cost of
running your monitoring sites shown below. My expert data ratification is
less than a single engineer call-out and that is before any parts. I can process your data better, faster and cheaper. |
||||||||||||
Data
Ratification Costs My ball park costs for data management range from a few hundred
to a few thousand pounds. This
depends on the number sites, pollutants and years. Data ratification processes your unscaled measurements into
reliable ratified concentrations. This either occurs throughout a year or at
the end. Statistical summary reports are produced that lists all the relevant
air quality statistics and exceedence counts required for Local Air Quality
Management (LAMA) reports. |
||||||||||||
Data
Management Costs My ball park costs for data management range from a few hundred
to a few thousand pounds. This
depends on the number sites, pollutants and years. I can provide the
following services.
|
||||||||||||
Other
Data Service Costs I regularly provide these services.
|
||||||||||||
Typical Costs for
the Entire Monitoring Site AEA
produced the following report outlining the typical costs of air quality
monitoring a few years ago. These are now wildly out-of-date but are a useful
summary of the items to consider. A Guide for Local Authorities Purchasing Air Quality
Monitoring Equipment
The cost of an automated air quality
monitoring programme will depend on many different factors, including
location, range of pollutants monitored and of course the duration of the
programme. |
||||||||||||
We only supply data
management and the expert data ratification. Customers often lump these
components into a single package with the site servicing and audits. Always ask for separate
prices for each item when issuing tenders. This allows you to cherry-pick the best prices across all the
responses. Otherwise, the instrument servicing price of our bid partners will
swamp our much smaller data management component. You may then end up with a
single organisation servicing your sites and managing the data. Although this
may be the cheapest option, the data managers are unlikely to criticise or
chase their own engineers leading to inevitable poor data quality. |
||||||||||||
I used to service
the instruments at WSL in the early 1980s. You can learn by watching the
engineers and reading the manuals. Everything was fine until the instrument
had a fault that needed to be fixed. There was no Internet to help so you
either tried a fix or paid the engineers. The few thousand spent on regular
servicing and repairs by the engineers is clearly a necessary expense.
Similarly a few hundred pounds spent on data ratification by an expert is
worthwhile. |
||||||||||||
Data
ratification and data management cannot be ignored. A few hundred or thousand
pounds spent can make an enormous difference to how customers, the government
and the public view your expensive data. |
||||||||||||
Contact me Geoff.Broughton@aqdm.co.uk |